Hypocrite!
By Katie Llanos-Small, September 26th, 2006
I use public transport often when I have the option of using a car, try to use locally produced goods, don’t eat meat, am careful to switch off lights, use heaters only when really necessary, and despise air conditioning. Yet in the last few months I have been responsible for over three tonnes of carbon dioxide being added to our already polluted atmosphere, just through air travel, according to Climate Care. Three tonnes!
Issues of environmental protection seem to be much more openly discussed in the British media than at home – interesting, given that New Zealand supposedly prides itself on being “clean and green”. Perhaps it’s because living in such densely populated little space like London one is much more aware that we are all just wallowing in our own muck. “Climate change” is not portrayed as a dubious theory that only wacky, knit-your-own-muesli Green Party types believe in. The UK’s equivalent of Don Brash – Conservative Party Leader David Cameron – rides a bicycle and speaks vociferously on the urgent need for action to reduce the speed of global warming.
On a personal level, air travel is the single most polluting action we can do. A plane journey produces more than twice as much carbon dioxide than a train trip of the same distance. But Europe is the world leader in air travel. Incredibly cheap flights abound: 25 quid return to Bologna, Barcelona, or Berlin. No-one really wants these prices to go up – but the truth is that they encourage seriously un-environmentally sound practices and don’t reflect the true cost to the planet of the flight.
A couple of things over the weekend have brought this up in my mind. On Sunday, a group of Plane Stupid activists, dressed in suits and led by a Baptist Minister, sat themselves down on the taxiway at the East Midland’s airport in Nottingham. While they get points for trying – especially the use of establishment symbols in the suits and Reverend – the downside of staging a protest on a runway is that no-one is allowed within cooee. I don’t know how they got in there, but the camera operators weren’t game for the same tricks, and the result was very distant shots of barely distinguishable activity. A slightly more accessible crack at the same topic came in the Independent on Sunday. Commandeered by editors of The Rough Guide, the paper’s travel section looked at responsible travel.
The whole picture’s pretty disturbing. On my upcoming one-way flight to Madrid I will account for a mere 0.14 tonnes of carbon dioxide poured into the atmosphere. But on a return flight home, from Heathrow to Auckland and back again, each passenger accounts for spewing out 6.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide. Various organisations like Climate Care, Carbon Neutral, CO2 Balance or Carbon Footprint allow you to pay for your pollution to be offset by way of environmental investments like planting trees, but these remedies can only do so much. We really do need to reduce our air travel.
Living on the other side of the world from most of my friends and family make it inevitable that I will periodically churn out tonnes of greenhouse gases getting home. I am entirely hippy-critical on this one. But I will make a conscious effort to use alternatives to air travel. I will try to resist the absurdly cheap flights. And don’t be too surprised if you hear I’m coming home overland on the trans-siberian railway.
Other posts by Katie Llanos-Small
September 26th, 2006 at 5:47 pm
I just love reading your stories; are you getting lots of hits on the site? I reckon some pieces, like this, ought to be published - by someone who pays you!!!!
September 28th, 2006 at 4:16 pm
I agree. You’re not full of rubbish. Not even half full.
3 tonnes per person flying NZ-UK really is an incredible figure. On a related note, have you detected much awareness of food mile issues in the UK?
September 28th, 2006 at 8:31 pm
Interesting stuff! Drat for all the people in NZ who want to do big travel…
I’m going to put a word in for trains.
Last year I had an InterRail all zones Europe month long travel pass. I love trains. And you get to meet some pretty interesting people and see some amazing scenery on the way.
Where possible, rail travel rocks.
October 6th, 2006 at 7:28 pm
Well I read about www in the paper the other day. That is, whacky welsh woman, who, because of the same sentiments you are expressing above, decided to travel to Australia to her best friend’s wedding - from Wales!! - without the use of flight. It took her weeks.
You don’t think it is all a publicity campaign by the owners of the big ocean-going liners. Those suckers must pump a fair bit of the old CO2 into the ozone as well.
And, do they count how many people are on the plane when you fly when they calculate how much CO2 each person is pumping out? Are we better to go only on full flights? I mean, surely the plane doesn’t put out alot more CO2 if there are more people on it, so if you’re packed in like a sardine, I guess you can at least feel virtuous.
The other bit I don’t get is “tonnes”? of CO2. I always thought it was basically air!! so 3 tonnes must be an awful big bulky thing.
Lots of love
Lynne
October 6th, 2006 at 8:19 pm
this was so interesting that I brought it up at work, and being the kind of people we are it wasn’t long before someone hunted up the info. we reckoned it is about 3 tonnes for a return trip not each way. Still half of a hella big number is still a lot. And yes, emmissions are measured in tonnes.
October 8th, 2006 at 9:03 am
Thanks guys!
Jess, I totally agree with you on the train travel score. I am a big fan of trains. As for flights out of New Zealand, I think I can possibly justify these somehow in my mind as not being quite so bad as short flights around Europe. These super-cheap European flights really are pretty wasteful, because it really is often just as easy to take a train or a bus as it is to fly. A lot of people prefer to fly to Edinburgh from London, for example, which I just don’t understand.
Lynne, you make some really good points. It must be a fairly rough calculation, given that the number of people on a flight can vary a lot. Still - big numbers!